Hi Piuysh,

Writing your own driver is certainly an option but it wouldn't be my
preferred option.  You are right; it takes a lot of time, efforts,
good design and implementation to build a good load driving tool.

In my opinion, it is better to just use whatever it is available out
in the open source space.  Something like JMeter for example has a
large community of developers working on improving and supporting it
as w ell as a lot of users that can provide hits/feedback on its use.
In addition, the source code is available to download and can change
according to your needs.  That is why I proposed to use the existing
load driver instead of developing one from scratch.

For my testing, I used just a simple JMeter scripts, mostly for my own
educational purposes.  However, I am working on creating a more
complex JMeter workload script for Daytrader.

Once completed, I will share it with you (the Geronimo development community).

Then we can work together on changing/improving it and maybe package
it with Daytrader sample.

Sounds good?

Slava


On 10/24/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you can get JMeter going that would be great.  I did try it and it used
an excessive amount of CPU but I may not have had it configured well.


On Oct 24, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:


Hi all,




It is great to have the Daytrader sample in the Geronimo projects.

Daytrader is an end-to-end application that allows a full functional

testing of Geronimo as well as measuring the performance of the

server.




However, in order to do a performance test, a users need to drive the

application with some kind of a load driving software.  And for that

they need to spend time and effort to develop scripts for driving the

sample.  Very often, they do not have the time or the desire to invest

in learning all the specifics about a new load driving tool and/or the

application just to be able to perform a test.  But if they are

provided will the scripts they will gladly use them.

Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to