On 10/30/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > Thanx. Please see comments inline - >
>> Couple thoughts on the poms: >> >> - the parent would lineage would be org.apache.openejb:itests -> >> org.apache.openejb:openejb >> - the groupId would be org.apache.openejb > > The groupId and the parent lineage looks good. As stated above, there > would be many child modules for the beans under the itests parent > module > > groupId: o.a.openejb > openejb -> itests -> itests-security-xxx > openejb -> itests -> itests-cmp2-xxx Exactly.
After having built the itest beans as per our discussion above, the contents of the openejb directory in m2 local repo are - ${settings.localRepository}/org/apache/openejb/ itests-cmp2-cmrmapping itests-cmp2-petstore itests-cmp2-prefetch itests-cmp2-storage itests-itests-core itests-security-001 itests-security-002 itests-security-003 openejb openejb-builder openejb-corba openejb-corba-builder openejb-core openejb-itests openejb-pkgen-builder openejb-sunorb openejb-yoko Does this look good ? Or should we move the itests artifacts one level down to groupId "o.a.openejb.itests" ?
-David
For now, I shall put all the tests into 1 artifact module. We should look at breaking them and putting them with their respective bean modules later on. Cheers Prasad.