Should it be Class.forName(NAMING_FACTORY_INITIAL) ?
--vamsi
On 11/2/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: rickmcguire
> Date: Wed Nov 1 09:48:44 2006
> New Revision: 470013
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=470013
> Log:
> GERONIMO-1840 NamingPropertiesTest is not compatible with non-Sun VMs.
...
> + try {
> + // the above assumes we're running on a Sun JVM. If we can't load the class first,
> + // we'll skip the attempt at creating the InitialContext. We've already verified that the
> + // system properties have been set to the correct values, so this last bit is largely a formality.
> + Class.forName("NAME_FACTORY_INITIAL");
> + new InitialContext();
> + } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
> + }
It's not the first time I ask for some help understanding a change and
this one is not an exception.
Why do we look up the "NAME_FACTORY_INITIAL" class since it's deemed
to fail every time?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
