-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Jencks wrote: > > After reading ken's comments I agree that keeping it in the sandbox > carries an unwanted implication that it's not ready for prime time.
I think that's pitching it a bit strongly, depending on what you mean by 'prime time.' When I meant to convey was that while something is in the sandbox, its presence there can give the impression that it's just a toy or thought-experiment for a small (possibly single) number of people, or perhaps a proof-of-concept. When it's gotten past that point and become something that multiple people want to have persist, then a home for it should be found outside the sandbox. It sounds like the EE 5 stuff falls into that category now: something that isn't just a toy, and that people expect will have a future. Where it should go outside the sandbox is the next question, and one I'm too ignorant of the technology to have an opinion about. :-) - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRVHkx5rNPMCpn3XdAQJDlwQAmMSVK8adpetruJ3dKypewqeLl+sOfClW R+RMD+sZhV3xKZwORL/dQJGdChZi8sM1KLEU/NLl2sJzNNJDyCiZxPEfMcPz4Jyn Hrxej5XxjAoRLLzVEZOJhcRSz47MRxU3yJRjSfVUpYpH292Q124eOBaKP3CG/JPE WwGNpr8hA/A= =+A99 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
