David Jencks wrote:
We're going to have mixed assemblies for a while until we complete all the ee 5 bits. I don't see any value in removing functionality from our server before we have an ee5 replacement.
Is it possible to have mixed assemblies without changing components that are common? For example, this change made rmi-naming dependent upon the 1.4 specs. When we create a jee5 specs do we need to also create another jee5 rmi-naming that is dependent upon it rather than the 1.4 specs?
I kinda like the jetty6 rather than jetty for the modules and configs (jars and modules???) I'm not thrilled about dropping the jetty5 support until it gets in the way of progress which I don't think it has yet. For assembly names I think jee5 is more appropriate than j2ee. Does jee5 show up somewhere else?
So is jetty6 just temporary until we get a working assembly and then at that time we would drop jetty5 and rename jetty6 to simply "jetty"?
Joe
