geronimo-k

Joe Bohn Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:43:56 -0800

Anita,

Yes, I did get past it and it doesn't appear to be related to yourearlier change. I'm not sure how I (or you) got into this problem ...but here's how I got out of it. I did a complete new build (startingwith -Dstage=bootstrap) with a clean repo. I suspect there might stillbe some issues building multiple releases that caused it (I was buildingboth trunk and 2.0-M1) but I'm not really certain.


Hope that helps,
Joe


anita kulshreshtha wrote:

Joe,
   Did you get past this? I am also unable to start
geronimo-tomcat6-jee5 built with rev 487196. However I can start
geronimo-tomcat6-minimal. The rev 485321 was committed on Dec 10th. The
changes discussed recently will not be ready for 2.0-M1. I do not
think(?) this is the culprit, But I will be happy to revert this.

Thanks
Anita

--- Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-SNAPSHOT/car?ServiceModule=org.apache.geronimo.configs/j

2ee-system/2.0-SNAPSHOT/car,j2eeType=AttributeStore,name=AttributeManager


targetClass=org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.LocalAttributeManager


org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.<init>(GBeanOperation.java:98)


org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.<init>(GBeanInstance.java:298)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.loadGBean(BasicKernel.java:354)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGBeans(ConfigurationUtil.java:363)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:155)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:126)

atorg.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon.doStartup(Daemon.java:242)

        at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon.<init>(Daemon.java:74)
        at
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon.main(Daemon.java:366)
[  ]  0%   1s Startup failed
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.InvalidConfigException: Unknown

startexceptionat


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGBeans(ConfigurationUtil.java:444)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:155)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:126)


targetClass=org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.LocalAttributeManager


org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.<init>(GBeanOperation.java:98)


org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.<init>(GBeanInstance.java:298)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.loadGBean(BasicKernel.java:354)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGBeans(ConfigurationUtil.java:363)

        ... 5 more
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.InvalidConfigException: Unknown

startexceptionat


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGBeans(ConfigurationUtil.java:444)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:155)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:126)


targetClass=org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.LocalAttributeManager


org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.<init>(GBeanOperation.java:98)


org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.<init>(GBeanInstance.java:298)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.loadGBean(BasicKernel.java:354)


org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGBeans(ConfigurationUtil.java:363)

        ... 5 more
Server shutdown begun
Server shutdown completed

Thanks,
Joe



anita kulshreshtha wrote:

Thanks Dain!

--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

needs
to be done:
1. .....Make the necessary code changes to
GBeanInfoBuilder while keeping the signatures of addOperation


methods same.

API compatibility - yes

  Serialization compatibility - depends on GOparationInfo

2. GoperationInfo must contain a field named targetClass
(declaringClass?). There are 2 options:
 a.. Just add the field and maintain backward compatibility



      API compatibility - yes
      Serialization compatibility - yes

 b.. Clean the code, i.e. remove unused field methodName and


break

the compatibility.



      API compatibility - no
      Serialization compatibility - no
   Even in Geronimo GOperationInfo does not seem to be used


outside of

the kernel, hence it will be safe to remove the constructors


without

the targetClass. I think we should not allow incomplete


GOpeartionInfo

return type that is more specific.  For example:

public interface Intf {
 Object getSomething();
}

public class Clazz implements Intf {
 public String getSomething() {
     return "something"
 }
}

-dain



 Ah.. java 5... One more question :)
   Why do we allow bad operations in GBeanInfo ? For example it is
possible to add a non existent operation to GBeanInfo.

Thanks

=== message truncated ===

____________________________________________________________________________________

Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com

Re: svn commit: r485321 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/modules: geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/ geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/runtime/ geronimo-kernel/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/ geronimo-k

Reply via email to