I think David is treating the branch as somewhat official and is bringing the community into it...nothing wrong with a healthy vote.
I suggest we head off what looks like may be turning into a "bike shed" thread. ;-) Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: > Matt has got a point. Voting on an svn branch is new. > > --vamsi > > On 12/21/06, *Matt Hogstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand this vote. BAsed on passed precedent we > generally vote on a set of binaries and not a source tree. I think > Dain offered to own releasing specs so will he be producing a set of > binaries to vote on? Voting on an SVN branch is a new twist for me :) > > I'm happy to vote that someone produce the elements to release. Did > I miss an e-mail? > > On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:55 AM, David Blevins wrote: > > > Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release. > > > > Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ > > branches/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0 > > > > I hereby propose we release this branch as final. > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > -David > > > > > > Matt Hogstrom > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >
