This is NOT how mvn works folks... I've been trying to explain that to you for the past weeks. You just don get it :-/
Good luck --jason -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:15:39 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release process change On Dec 22, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > On Dec 22, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> From what I understand, the problem you are focusing on >> is just a naming problem: you want the GA release to be >> named 2.0. That's fine. But it only concerns the final >> downloadables archives, right ? This is a good point. For the assemblies, from a "marketing" standpoint, we can version them any way we want. > > Nope, since mvn releases each component's artifact separately, its > not just the zip/tgz that one traditionally thinks of as the > release... its every single artifact that gets spit out of the > release. We should deal with the module versions separately from the assemblies. I'll hop back on this next week...I'm taking a few days of R & R. Cheers Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
