Yep. The branches\1.2 tree is being stabilized an Rick is finishing
the Yoko integration. Bug fixes are fine but I ask you to be extra
careful since I hope to ship this as soon as the Yoko integration
passes the TCK.
-dain
On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are there new features for 1.2 already?
Since it takes a while for us to get releases out, its probably
best to minimize non-bugfix changes to the branch, though I suppose
if its a minor improvement that is should be fine, major feature
work should be avoided (preferring that for 2.0 actually).
During this stabilization of 1.2 I would say that anything outside
of a bugfix should probably be presented to the list for direction
as to if it should go into 1.2, wait until 1.2 is out, or just in
2.0. And then lets just take it case by case. I think its okay
for new bits to get added to a beta. And hopefully soon when we
get to RCx then we will have a faster turn around to get a release
out.
--jason
On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:22 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thank you for your clarification. Since 1.2 beta is out, I was
under the impression that we will be stabilizing the 1.2 branch
and not put any new functions/improvements. New functions/
improvements can still go into 1.x. My confusion was whether to
hold back commits to branches\1.2 unless it is a bug fix. As for
the bug fixes, they will go into all relevant branches.
--vamsi
On 12/28/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Um... its
where code for the 1.2* line of Geronimo goes.
I'd imagine that if a a fix for "1.x" is applicable for the 1.2 line
then it could be committed there, probably also to branches/1.1 too
if its a bug fix for both.
Sure improvement fixes can still go into 1.2, and be marked for fix
in 1.2, since 1.2 is not yet out the door. Once 1.2 is officially
out, then bugs/whatever for the 1.2 line will go into branches/1.2
and should be marked for fix in "1.2.1", etc.
This seems kinda obvious to me... maybe I'm missing something in your
question?
--jason
On Dec 27, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> What is the purpose of branches\1.2 as it stands now? Can fixes
> targeted for "1.x" be committed to this branch? If not, where
> should this ffixes go? Can fixes for JIRAs marked as "Improvement"
> be still committed to branches\1.2 and designated as fixed in
"1.2"?
>
> --vamsi