Hi David, Let's discuss when you get a chance please--still trying to understand
your proposed arrangement. Also, re-opened this jira--didn't follow the correct
protocol.
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
David Jencks (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474122 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2816:
----------------------------------------
I think there's a lot of good code in these patches but I think it may be
better to arrange it into different classes. I posted my idea on the Re:
ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing dev list thread.
Depending on which approach we agree on I can commit this or rearrange it as I
suggested.
BTW I think we usually resolve an issue when the fix is committed rather than
when a patch is available.
@EJB/@EJBs annotation support
-----------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-2816
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2816
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: public(Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0
Reporter: Tim McConnell
Assigned To: Tim McConnell
Fix For: 2.0
Attachments: AnnotationHelper-3.java, AnnotationHelper.java,
AnnotationHelper.java, EJBAnnotationHelper-3.java, EJBAnnotationHelper.java,
EJBAnnotationHelper.java, GERONIMO-2816-2.patch, GERONIMO-2816-3.patch,
GERONIMO-2816.patch
Code and patches to support the @EJB and @EJBs annotations
