OK I think Matthias is watching this thread. Best wishes, Paul
On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do they need the deploy automated by Continuum to get something out in the snap repo? Someone should publish the first set by hand now so we can consume them... --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: > There's a discussion right now on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about how to get their > 1.2 snapshots published to the ASF snapshot repo. I'm inclined to > leave the local repo in place for now since they appear to be close to > a solution, just working out some permission bits on contiuum I think. > But if there are immediate concerns I can adjust the jasper config to > use the staging repo that Matthias has kindly provided. Just let me > know. And of course Jason if you feel like moving things around then > don't let my foot dragging get in your way ;-) > > Best wishes, > Paul > > > On 2/23/07, Anita Kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> --- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Folks, the local module repository thing is................... and >> >really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. >> I was tempted to change it 1.2.0-XXXXXXXX. Every morning my offline >> build fails in jasper config. I build jasper config online, which >> marks >> SNAPSHOTs as updated. After that everything works fine. Since >> there are >> two of us who have noticed it, it is time to change the SNAPSHOT to >> something else. >> >> Thanks >> Anita >> >> >> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> _______________ >> Cheap talk? >> Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. >> http://voice.yahoo.com >>
