OK. M3 changes done. Will do the same for trunk and 1.2.
Cheers Prasad On 2/27/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would leave the m3 branch alone... its not worth the effort to change things there... though you may want to merge the myfaces repo changes (configs/jasper) from trunk, to help with SNAPSHOT resolution when Mvn tries to perform updates. As for the rest of these, I mentioned a way to handle this in the short-term in a mail I sent about "Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts". * * * What's the motivation to do this to m3 (which is a very short-lived branch)? --jason On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > In doing the release I've run into a few different repos scattered > in the tree. I'd like to move those repos to a top level > repository directory for the tree. This helps out so that any > artifacts that are related to a release are put in one place. > > Here is the list of repos: > > .//applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/repository > .//applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/java/org/ > apache/geronimo/console/repository > .//applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/main/webapp/ > WEB-INF/view/repository > .//applications/geronimo-dojo/repository > .//applications/geronimo-uddi-server/repository > .//configs/jasper/repository > > I would prefer to move these artifacts up to a top level ./ > repository directory that is maintained as part of the tree and add > this repo at the root level. I'm wondering if there is a specific > reason that they are located on a per module basis? > > I'm heading for a plane and will be disconnected for a while so if > someone has some spare cycles it would be most appreciated if this > could be done in the 2.0-M3 tree. > > I'd like to discuss this for trunk.
