Good point... we should start ripping that stuff out, probably save a
wee bit of space in the assembly.
Though... by doing so we are at the mercy of the JVM to provide a JMX
system that doesn't suck ass (horrible bugs, etc).
--jason
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
We don't need mx4j in 2.0 since jmx is in the vm starting with Java5.
-dain
On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone know if we can replace these bits in
GeronimoLogging.initialize()
<snip>
try {
Class clazz = Class.forName("mx4j.log.Log");
Class paramClazz = Class.forName("mx4j.log.Logger");
Method method = clazz.getDeclaredMethod("redirectTo", new Class
[] {paramClazz});
paramClazz = Class.forName("mx4j.log.CommonsLogger");
method.invoke(null, new Object[] {paramClazz.newInstance()});
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
// MX4J is not present.
} catch (Exception e) {
throw (AssertionError) new AssertionError("Cannot force MX4J
to use commons logging.").initCause(e);
}
</snip>
With:
<snip>
System.setProperty("mx4j.log.prototype", "mx4j.log.CommonsLogger");
</snip>
--jason
