Thanks for the fast answers.
>Btw, jboss esb fails being a standard jbi implementation, its benchmark >prooved to be a disaster. yhofri could you tell me where you read about this benchmark?this is a very interesting point for me. yhofri wrote: > > Btw, jboss esb fails being a standard jbi implementation, its benchmark > prooved to be a disaster. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hofri Yehuda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 1:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Why Using ServiceMix? > > Hi, > I've integrated standard jbi components with servicemix 3.1, and vouch > it works great. > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 1:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Why Using ServiceMix? > > On 3/5/07, goldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hallo! >> >> I have a some questions considering the usage of ServiceMix. >> >> Why one should use ServiceMix? Instead you could use the standard JBI > > ServiceMix is standard JBI? > > >> or you >> could use JBoss ESB. > > JBoss ESB != JBI - it looks pretty proprietary technology when I last > looked > > >> So where are the adantages of ServiceMix? > > Its Apache licensed, has a very lively community and is based fully on > the JBI standard and has been around for a while now (version 3.1 just > released). > > >> How does it >> work in practice? How difficult is the configuration and so on? > > The configuration is simple XML which can be embedded inside Spring if > you require > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-Using-ServiceMix--tf3348021s12049.html#a9315177 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
