On Mar 12, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:

Hi Folks,

I noticed some in consistencies in the Geronimo console when it comes to Jetty & Tomcat environments while we are creating HTTPS listeners (two different UIs). Tomcat GUI support both PKCS12 and JKS key stores while Jetty only supports JKS (there are some other differences too). Is there any reason behind this kind of change? Can't we use the same GUI for this kind of activity because it will give G user same environment whether it is Tomcat or Jetty ?

Also in Tomcat HTTPS listener supports PKCS12 key store type G currently only supports JKS type. Can't we add the PKCS12 in to the G key stores since it is more industry standard when it comes to key stores than JKS? I remembered using bouncy castle as security provider with PKCS12 sometime back without any issues ;-) . Any insight would be greatly appriciated.

I would like to spend some of my time on these issues if there is no big technical (also legal) barrier associated with it :-) .

so far I've stayed out of this discussion :-)

There's been discussion of similar issues in https:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2015. We have to be very careful about importing more of the bouncy castle code than we already have to avoid potential patent infringement issues.

From a design perspective I would like to see first that our tomcat integration uses a keystore gbean like the jetty integration does, and then the additional keystore be added. However both of these parts would be great from my point of view.

It looks from the jira comments that some people have concerns about compatibility across different platforms. Is this taken care of by the move to jdk 1.5 in g. 2.0?

thanks
david jencks



Thanks,
Lasantha


Reply via email to