On Mar 20, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:39 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 3/20/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think we've been specific enough about what goes where for
jason's proposal to make sense yet, as gianni points out.
I'm sure we don't want all 100K artifacts we produce all under o.a.g
or o.a.g.server
I mostly definitely agree. In the maven repo, dumping all the
artifacts in the o.a.g.server directory would be very confusing.
WAIT! We most certainly are not going to be dumping all artifacts
into one groupId... so lets just stop that talk here... that does
not make sence, will not happen.
In retrospect I should have rephrased this. I just got a bit
frustrated... and I apologize.
We certainly need to deal with the huge number of modules we have and
how they represented in the src tree and into the repo. I don't
think we can fix that just yet, as the change to make that happen is
larger than simply changing the groupIds.
--jason
