I'm fine (down?) with it as long as it doesn't create build problems and I don't have to set it up. I voted +0, not -0.

thanks
david jencks

On Mar 21, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

BTW, with the latest retrotranslator-maven-plugin, the translate- project goal makes translation and install/publish transparent, defaulting to using jdk14 for the classifier for the translated bits.

I'm also not sure why folks are anti publishing these jars... they are there to support folks who are using JDK 1.4. I suppose if users want they can retrotranslate themselves... but thats more work. Perhaps if folks are still -1 on this, once people start to ask for this they will reconsider? I dunno... seems harmless to retrotranslate them IMO. Not like xbean has 200 modules like G does.

--jason


On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

Why are you both reluctant to publish retrotranslated jars ?

On 3/21/07, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

-1 (not a veto but a cancelable vote) on publishing retro-jars.


Regards,
Alan

On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:55 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> +1 to 1.5 only
> +0 to publishing retro-jars
>
> david jencks
>
> On Mar 20, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Looks like xbean-naming is still compiling for 1.4.  Is there any
>> specific reason for this?  Can we switch all of xbean to compile
>> for 1.5... and if you need 1.4 compat, then use the
>> retrotranslator-maven-plugin's translate-project goal to make
>> jdk14 artifacts?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> geronimo-naming jar
>>>
>>> I think you'll find you need to update xbean-naming.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>> On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> The server/trunk build is picking this up in configs/rmi-
>>>> naming... but from where?
>>>>
>>>> Need to update this to use java.util.concurrent... its using
>>>> backport-concurrent-util at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>
>>
>
>




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/


Reply via email to