I'm fine to wait to change this a little longer... but as soon as we
have to start producing artifacts, publishing to repos or making
assemblies then this should be fixed.
But is it really that muck work to do a global search and replace
"org.apache.j2g" -> "org.apache.geronimo.j2g" ? I do this all the
time with jEdit... its quite simple and quick.
--jason
On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Yeah we should insert ".geronimo" before j2g, but I just got done
refactoring alot of stuff and don't want to spend the time redoing
it all overagain. Its not just the packages that would have to get
changed again, but bundle id's, manifest references, extension
points, etc...
Since Its currently in sandbox, we can just make it a requirement
before we move it out of sandbox.
-sachin
On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I asked about this before, but got no answer.
Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g"
as a package name? This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other
codelines which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
Why?
--jason
