If Matt had no problem deploying and testing DT, could it be a Java
version or classpath issue?
That could explain the difference in the exception during deployment
(and the problems during deployment could possibly explain the run time
problems).
Jay
Christopher Blythe wrote:
I use a commercial load driving tool... FYI, I'm fairly certain that
G-2.0 has the same issue.
On 4/6/07, *David Jencks* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I think we need to figure out why the
concurrentModificationException is happening before we release. I
think that one possible reason is that we are multithreading
stateless session bean instances. I hope this isn't the cause....
but IMO we need to find out.
Chris, how do you run the several clients? manually or with a tool?
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Gave it a shot... no luck. As soon as I started 2 clients, the
same exceptions started to pile up. I have attached the
geronimo.log. Also, noticed the following exception during startup.
14:05:00,640 ERROR [TransportConnector] Could not accept
connection from /127.0.0.1:28428: java.io.IOException: Wire
format negociation timeout: peer did not send his wire format.
java.io.IOException: Wire format negociation timeout: peer did
not send his wire format.
at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.oneway
(WireFormatNegotiator.java:88)
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:47)
at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.dispatch
(TransportConnection.java:1138)
at
org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processDispatch(TransportConnection.java:805)
at
org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.start(TransportConnection.java
:885)
at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnector$1.onAccept
(TransportConnector.java:148)
at
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransportServer.run(TcpTransportServer.java:167)
at java.lang.Thread.run (Thread.java:797)
On 4/6/07, *Matt Hogstrom* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Only a very light load from a few browsers. One thing to try
is to increase the number of SLSBs in the pool.
Can you add
<session>
<ejb-name>TradeJDBC</ejb-name>
<jndi-name>ejb/TradeJDBC</jndi-name>
<cache-size>100</cache-size>
</session>
to your plan and redeploy. I added some support for multiple
SLSBs in a pool for 1.2 which we did not have before. This
will hopefully make it better and not worse :)
On Apr 6, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Matt...
You mentioned that you deployed DayTrader 1.2... did you
happen to run it under load? JDBC/Direct mode looks good;
however, I am still seeing ConcurrentModificationExceptions
while attempting to run more than 1 client in Session Direct
mode ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2708).
These exceptions are thrown throughout the duration of the
run. FYI - I deployed the same ear on Geronimo 1.1.1 and
didn't have a problem scaling up the users for Session
Direct mode.
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.remove(HashMap.java:861)
at
org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.connectiontracking.ConnectionTrackingCoordinator.exit
(ConnectionTrackingCoordinator.java :127)
at
org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.connectiontracking.ConnectionTrackingCoordinator$$FastClassByCGLIB$$5d33aabf.invoke(<generated>)
at net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastMethod.invoke
(FastMethod.java :53)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.FastMethodInvoker.invoke(FastMethodInvoker.java:38)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:122)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke
(GBeanInstance.java:820)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.RawInvoker.invoke(RawInvoker.java:57)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawOperationInvoker.invoke(RawOperationInvoker.java:35)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.ProxyMethodInterceptor.intercept
(ProxyMethodInterceptor.java:96)
at
org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.connectiontracking.ConnectionTracker$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$b6b1324a.exit(<generated>)
at
org.apache.openejb.NoConnectionEnlistingInterceptor.invoke
(NoConnectionEnlistingInterceptor.java:70)
at
org.apache.openejb.SystemExceptionInterceptor.invoke(SystemExceptionInterceptor.java:35)
at
org.apache.openejb.security.DefaultSubjectInterceptor.invoke(DefaultSubjectInterceptor.java
:49)
at
org.apache.openejb.slsb.DefaultStatelessEjbContainer.invoke(DefaultStatelessEjbContainer.java:178)
at
org.apache.openejb.slsb.DefaultStatelessEjbContainer$$FastClassByCGLIB$$7ad7a562.invoke(<generated>)
at
net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastMethod.invoke(FastMethod.java:53)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.FastMethodInvoker.invoke(FastMethodInvoker.java:38)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke
(GBeanOperation.java:122)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:820)
at
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.RawInvoker.invoke(RawInvoker.java:57)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawOperationInvoker.invoke
(RawOperationInvoker.java:35)
at
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.ProxyMethodInterceptor.intercept(ProxyMethodInterceptor.java:96)
at
org.apache.openejb.StatelessEjbContainer$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$5c554f35.invoke
(<generated>)
at
org.apache.openejb.AbstractEjbDeployment.invoke(AbstractEjbDeployment.java:195)
at
org.apache.openejb.proxy.EJBMethodInterceptor.intercept(EJBMethodInterceptor.java:145)
at
org.apache.openejb.proxy.SessionEJBObject$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$f5a9c1b2.login
(<generated>)
at
org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.TradeAction.login(TradeAction.java:449)
at org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.
web.TradeServletAction.doLogin
<http://web.TradeServletAction.doLogin>(TradeServletAction.java:364)
at org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.
web.TradeAppServlet.performTask
<http://web.TradeAppServlet.performTask>(TradeAppServlet.java:126)
at org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.
web.TradeAppServlet.doPost
<http://web.TradeAppServlet.doPost>(TradeAppServlet.java:91)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service
(HttpServlet.java:617)
at
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:690)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter
(ApplicationFilterChain.java:252)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter
(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
at org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.
web.OrdersAlertFilter.doFilter
<http://web.OrdersAlertFilter.doFilter>(OrdersAlertFilter.java:91)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java
:202)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter
(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke
(StandardContextValve.java:178)
at
org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.valve.DefaultSubjectValve.invoke(DefaultSubjectValve.java:56)
at
org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.GeronimoStandardContext$SystemMethodValve.invoke(GeronimoStandardContext.java
:328)
at
org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.valve.GeronimoBeforeAfterValve.invoke(GeronimoBeforeAfterValve.java:47)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke
(ErrorReportValve.java:105)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:541)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service
(CoyoteAdapter.java:148)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java
:667)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run
(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:797)
On 4/5/07, *Jason Dillon* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Aight, no worries. I still don't fully understand all
that plugin stuff... yet ;-)
--jason
On Apr 5, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
The change I have cued up replaces " 1.2-SNAPSHOT" with
" 1.2" for all the catalog entries. So it would break
anyone using the Geronimo plugin repo from a
1.2-SNAPSHOT server (maybe not a huge deal). Also,
I've tested the catalog updates by looping http
requests to repo1.maven.org/maven2
<http://repo1.maven.org/maven2> back to my local maven
repo. So I've made some assumptions about the repo
layout that should probably be verified.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Apr 5, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Will it hurt anything to commit it now? Or will it
break things?
--jason
On Apr 5, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Apr 5, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I couldn't do much with the framework assembly as it
requires a plugin repository with 1.2 plugins and
AFAIK there is no such plugin repository available
yet. Will you be making the plugins available for
1.2 as you make the release available? If not, then
perhaps we shouldn't include the framework assembly
in the distribution.
I updated the plugin catalog stuff in
site/trunk/docs/plugins/geronimo- 1.2 locally and ran
some quick tests of plugin download & install from
maven repo. I'm ready to commit if/when the 1.2
artifacts are published to central.
Best wishes,
Paul
--
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say
let... lets evolve, let the chips fall where they may." -
Tyler Durden
--
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let...
lets evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden
<geronimo.log>
--
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets
evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden
