Umm... the sources jars still don't have the LICENSE/DISCLAIMER/NOTICE files in them.
The sigs look OK though. They validated fine. Dan On Friday 18 May 2007 10:13, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I have uploaded a new release that should solve the last two problems. > I agree we will have to address the first one before next release. > I think due to this new upload, the vote period should be extended by > 24 hours. > > On 5/17/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:28, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > > [ X ] -1 Do not release ServiceMix 3.1.1 > > > > > > I will upload a rat report asap. > > > > I figure I'll -1 this before it gets to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Issues: > > 1) Procedural: you published these into the release repository. > > Thus, they are already released. They should be staged into a > > staging area, voted on there, then if the vote passes, moved into > > the release repository. As it stands right now, it's technically > > already released without a vote. > > > > 2) The sources jars and javadoc jars don't have the disclaimer, > > notice, or license files in them. Thus, they are not releasable. > > (look into the remote-resources plugin, the cxf/trunk/parent pom is > > an example.) > > > > 3) Nothing has been gpg signed. All release artifacts must be gpg > > signed. A "release" profile with the gpg plugin would solve this. > > (you can use the cxf/trunk pom as an example) > > > > Anyway, IMO, it's not ready to go. If you have problems with the > > maven stuff, feel free to ping me. I'd be glad to help out. > > > > -- > > J. Daniel Kulp > > Principal Engineer > > IONA > > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
