Donald Woods wrote: > So, if we are using virtual hosts, we'll have no way of knowing which > host(s) an app maps to? If we have /welcome installed on multiple > virtual hosts, will we now see it listed multiple times as just /welcome ?
Nope. The web app is deployed as just that...a web app. The web app has a single context...and that is what is reported. The URL is not fair because Tomcat can have valves that can turn on/off IP addresses/ports/etc. If we want to get into introspection of which connectors its listening on, which schemes, which ports, which virtual hosts, etc, I highly recommend we start talking about MBean exposure and JMX to do this properly and effectively. Jeff > > > -Donald > > Jeff Genender wrote: >> Yup... >> >> The old messages made no sense at all...because Web application != >> connector and therefore its not fair to determine that the web >> applications actually listen on http. In long discussions with David >> Jencks, we agreed the slapping of http in from of the URL was purely a >> hack and was not correct for complex cases...i.e. the applications you >> listed also are running on https *and* ajp. In otherwords, the web >> application is independent of the scheme (http) and it shouldn't know >> its own scheme. >> >> It *is* correct for the web application to know it's identified by the >> context, and thats why you see them listed. >> >> I hope this made sense. >> >> Jeff >> >> >> Kevan Miller wrote: >>> I noticed that the server started messages have changed. The started Web >>> Applications are now of the following form: >>> >>> Web Applications: >>> / >>> /console >>> /console-standard >>> /dojo >>> /remote-deploy >>> >>> Geronimo Application Server started >>> >>> Where they used to be: >>> >>> Web Applications: >>> http://coltrane:8080/ >>> http://coltrane:8080/console >>> http://coltrane:8080/console-standard >>> http://coltrane:8080/dojo >>> http://coltrane:8080/remote-deploy >>> >>> Geronimo Application Server started >>> >>> I'm assuming that this is associated with the recent Connector >>> changes... I preferred the old messages, but I doubt I'll lose very much >>> sleep... Apologies if I missed discussion about this. Even more >>> apologies if the network config on my machine has gone bonkers... ;-) >>> >>> --kevan >> >>
