+1
David Jencks wrote:
I'm not sure if/when we've faced this in the past but I'd be
comfortable with:
- moving code to plugins
- announcing it on the dev list
- in 3-7 days pushing a snapshot if there are no major objections
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 22, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Followup question:
Once a plugin has been moved from /sandbox to /plugins, is it OK to
go ahead and deploy snapshots of the plugin to the ASF snapshot
repo? The specific reason I'm asking is because the extensible
console work that has been going on in GERONIMO-3345 and
GERONIMO-3413 is at the point where it would be great to get some
feedback and collaboration without having to build the plugins from
source. According to http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html
the PMC needs to be "happy" with the binaries before they are
"released" to the snapshot repo -- although "release" doesn't seem
like the right term for them to use for stuff in the snapshot repo.
So, is a heads-up on the dev list adequate for this type of activity,
or is something more formal required?
Best wishes,
Paul
On Aug 21, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I was wondering if there is a procedure to be followed to put new
code in geronimo\plugins? I intend to move the geronimo-tuscany
integration thing Manu and myself are working on out of sandbox and
put under geronimo\plugins. Also, is there a release cycle for
geronimo plugins?
Thanks and regards,
Vamsi
.
