On Sep 7, 2007, at 4:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 7, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I was collecting the different schema files used by Geronimo to
publish them on a web site and I noticed one thing with the
plugins-1.2 xsd. First, it imports attributes-1.1.xsd and not
attributes-1.2.xsd. And that's fine. That's what 2.0.1 came out with.
But in trunk the plugins-1.2.xsd was updated to import
attributes-1.2.xsd. I don't think that is right as it will break
compatibility. I think we should create plugins-1.3.xsd (with -1.3
namespace) which then can import the attributes-1.2.xsd (and switch
the plugins-1.2.xsd to the version in branches/2.0).
I guess I didn't notice that 2.0.1 was going out with something
called plugins-1.2 when I started working on GERONIMO-3330 which
also included a rather different plugins-1.2. I'll see about
renaming the file in trunk to plugins-1.3 although it might take me
a few days.
I think I fixed this... hopefully without breaking everything.
david jencks
I also validated the rest of the .xsd files and for the most part
they
validate ok. A few of them ( geronimo-web-2.0.xsd,
geronimo-jetty-2.0.xsd, and geronimo-tomcat-2.0.xsd) import
persistence-1.0.xsd as a local file. I can't find that file anywhere
in Geronimo. Should I update these Geronimo .xsd files to refer to
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_1_0.xsd or should
we pull it in locally?
I'm not sure what you mean by "refer to..." but either one is fine
with me as long as I don't have to deal with any questions about
whether CDDL licensed source files can be in apache svn. It looks
like the current draft of the 3rd party licensing policy would
allow us to include a cddl licensed persistence_1_0.xsd:
http://people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html
redirected from http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
thanks
david jencks
Jarek
