I very much favor and endorse changing the file logging level to INFO. Ted Kirby
On 9/11/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, that changing the file logging level to INFO is more usable for the > majority of our users. > > -Donald > > > Kevan Miller wrote: > > The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the > > Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term (e.g. > > Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our logging code. I'd > > like to see more structure and consistency in our logging. However, > > that's not a 2.0.x issue. > > > > The current default log level for a Geronimo 2.0.1 server is ERROR. IMO, > > this is too restrictive. I think we should set the default to INFO. This > > will make our server logging more verbose. However, I'd rather have too > > much information, rather than too little. > > > > I think our default target audience should be application developers and > > new users evaluating Geronimo. Currently, these users are forced to > > configure log levels to INFO, so that they can obtain necessary > > information for building and deploying applications on Geronimo. This > > information should be available by default, not requiring configuration... > > > > Users who want to limit the logging output can reconfigure the default > > logging levels, once they are more comfortable with Geronimo. > > > > Comments? > > > > --kevan > > > > > >
