[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3481:
------------------------------------------
Attachment: GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch
GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch addressed this issue. I can not explain how or why
it works. With the patch, I have deployed a security realm and an ejb app
using offline deployer without hitting port any port conflicts. Can someone
explain how this is workiing?
Here is how I arrived at the patch:
1. I noticed that offline deployer is calling applyOverrides() on
AttributeManager( based on var/config/jsr88-configurer-config.xml) where as I
will expect it to call the method on ServerAttributeManager(based on
var/config/config.xml)
2. With 1 in mind, I changed line 138 in KernelConfigurationManager to use
configurationList instead of attributeStore. This will not break the server as
configurationList and attributeStore are the same for it. But this resulted in
test failures.
3. I reverted 2 and changed the online-deployer plan file so that
ConfigurationManager->AttributeStore uses ServerAttributeManager and
ConfigurationManager->PersistentConfigurationList uses AttributeManager. With
this change, the deployer ran fine but did not update config.xml
4. I finally resorted to using ServerAttributeManager for both AttributeStore
and PersistentConfigurationList in online-deployer plan.
I thought it would compute all the configurations in config.xml as the configs
to be started. When I check in the debugger, it is computing only those five
configs in jsr88-configurer-config.xml as the configs to be started when the
offline deployer is invoked. MainConfigurationBootstrapper is using the
AttibuteManager from online-deployer config to get the persistent
configurations though AttributeManager is not connected with
ConfigurationManager.
Note: By offline deployer, I am referring to invoking deploy.bat with
"--offline" option
> Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3481
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Affects Versions: 2.0.1, 2.0.x, 2.1
> Environment: G 2.0.1 - Running multiple instances
> Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.0.x, 2.1
>
> Attachments: GERONIMO-3481-1.patch, GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch
>
>
> Offline deployer throws Bind Exception when port 1099 is in use. Here is a
> scenario steps in which the problem is experienced.
> 1. Extract G-2.0.1-Tomcat distro to C:\
> 2. Create a dir "myserver" under C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1 and copy
> C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\var to
> C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var (all sub-directories).
> 3. Edit
> C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var\config-substitutions.properties to
> set PortOffset=10.
> 4. Open a command window and start Geronimo. Since
> org.apache.geronimo.server.name is not set, this will start the default
> server instance.
> 5. Open a second command window, set
> GERONIMO_OPTS=-Dorg.apache.geronimo.server.name=myserver. This will be
> command window to run the second server instance with name "myserver"
> 6. Run deploy.bat --offline list-modules.
> At step 6, I am getting a BIND Exception since port 1099 is in use (by the
> default server instance) and the offline deployer is attempting to start rmi
> naming on port 1099. Since, this deploy command is run against second server
> instance, I would expect that it uses the configuration properties of
> "myserver" in which case it should use port 1109 to start rmi-naming if at
> all there is a need. When port 1099 is not in use, the offline deployer
> works as expected by updating proper config.xml file when a configuration is
> deployed/undeployed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
