That would have been a good idea to OSGify these components, but this is not blocking, as we can still wrap them in OSGi bundles. Thanks anyway, i guess I'll do that at some point in the coming weeks.
On Jan 10, 2008 9:10 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another change: > > r610695 | djencks | 2008-01-09 22:36:09 -0800 (Wed, 09 Jan 2008) | 1 > line > > GERONIMO-3718 remove unused class that should have stayed in g. when > it was still used > > I wonder if the servicemix folks would like this to be osgi-ified > before this release? > > I plan to look at the jars and vote later today or tomorrow. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:35 AM, David Blevins wrote: > > > Discuss thread (for reference): > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Changes since last release: > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > r585608 | dain | 2007-10-17 10:56:54 -0700 (Wed, 17 Oct 2007) | 1 > > line > > > > Added generic types to all collections usage > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > r585309 | dain | 2007-10-16 17:54:22 -0700 (Tue, 16 Oct 2007) | 1 > > line > > > > clear proxy reference after returning to caller so the proxy can > > be garbage collected > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > r584554 | akulshreshtha | 2007-10-14 08:19:58 -0700 (Sun, 14 Oct > > 2007) | 1 line > > > > GERONIMO-3250 Adding counters to keep track of transaction > > activity, Patch by Viet H. Nguyen > > > > Binaries: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-txmanager/repo/org/<http://people.apache.org/%7Edblevins/stage-txmanager/repo/org/> > > apache/geronimo/components/ > > > > Branch: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/ > > branches/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.1/ > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours and close on the 13th > > > > [ ] +1 - Yes, release it > > [ ] 0 - Hmm... > > [ ] -1 - No, because... > > > > > > Vote away! > > > > -David > > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
