It seems like if we are going to release this spec then we should use it
ourselves and validate it by running the tck for geronimo with it
instead of the axis2-saaj-api jar. I'll give it a shot locally and see
how things go.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
I was going to test out these specs in Geronimo prior to voting but I
couldn't find a reference to this spec in G. It looks like we use
axis2-saaj-api for this currently. Is the plan to also switch Geronimo
over to this new spec jar?
Joe
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Well, actually, the subject is right, but the typo is in the body.
Let me rewrite it:
I've uploaded a release of SAAJ 1.3 spec for vote.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0/
Repo
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0/>
Please review and vote:
[ ] +1 Release SAAJ 1.3 spec
[ ] -1 Do not release it
On Jan 29, 2008 3:41 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Guillaume,
Subject has a typo :)
+1 from me.
-- dims
On Jan 29, 2008 9:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> I've uploaded a release of JAAS 1.3 spec for vote.
> Tag:
>
>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
> Repo
>
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-jaas_1.3_spec-1.0/>
>
> Please review and vote:
> [ ] +1 Release jaas 1.3 spec
> [ ] -1 Do not release it
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
