+1

++Vamsi

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> New releases of the javamail spec and javamail provider jars are
> necessary for a Geronimo 2.1.1 release.  We're voting on these
> collectively.
>
> 1)  Release 1.3 of the javamail 1.4 spec API.  The artifact in question
> is geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.3.  This jar includes two bug fixes,
> GERONIMO-3842 and GERONIMO-3853.  The release archive is located here:
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/staging-repo/specs/>
>
> Staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/staging-site/specs/>
>
> 2)  Release 1.4 of the javamail 1.4 mail package.  This package includes
> bug fixes for, and upgrade to genesis 1.4 (for the release process).
> Changes include picking up the new javamail spec, additional changes for
> GERONIMO-3842, and updating to Genesis 1.4 to facilitate the release
> process for this and future releases.
>
> This package has a top level pom and two child artifacts:
>
> top level pom:       geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.4
> javamail provider:   geronimo_javamail_1.4_provider-1.4.jar
> javamail mail:       geronimo_javamail_1.4_mail-1.4.jar
>
> The geronimo_javamail_1.4_mail-1.4 artifact is the uber-jar containing
> the merged spec and provider class files.
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/javamail/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejbohn/staging-repo/javamail/>
>
>
> These artifacts created using the maven-release-plugin
>
> The tag locations are:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.3
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.4/
>
> I have yet to test these changes in the Geronimo server with the tck
> tests but will do that now, concurrent to the vote.  I'll hold my vote
> until I confirm there are no tck implications.
>
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
>
> Joe
>

Reply via email to