Vasily Zakharov wrote:
Kevan,

Do you mean we could switch the trunk to jaxb-impl 2.1.6 right now?

I could prepare a patch and put it to GERONIMO-3951.

Vasily

IMO it would be a good idea to understand the current state of the tck in trunk prior to attempting this so that we understand which issues are linked to this change and which are not.

Joe




On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Apr 4, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote:
Hi, all,

I see Geronimo still uses jaxb-impl version 2.0.5, while 2.1.6 is the
latest stable release.
Is there any particular reason for that?
What do you people think about switching to 2.1.x?

I was recently investigating a nasty intermittent failure of
org.apache.geronimo.cxf.CXFHandlerResolverTest test on Harmony
(HARMONY-5625) and it seems the problem is in JAXB implementation. The
problem occurs on jaxb-impl-2.1.3 and earlier and doesn't occur on
jaxb-impl-2.1.4 and later. I suspect JAXB issue 383 [1] is the cause.

In other words, bugs in jaxb-impl 2.0.5 are affecting Geronimo
operation, at least on Harmony, and that looks like a reason for
switching to a newer release.

Vasily

[1] https://jaxb.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=383

Hi Vasily,
Thanks for the info. JAXB 2.1 presents Java EE 5 TCK issues for us. We're
working to learn from Sun how to pass the TCK w/ JAXB/JAXWS 2.1. Not
something that i'd anticipate for a near-term, 2.0/2.1 release. However,
don't see why we shouldn't start exploring this on our dev trunk (e.g.
2.2-SNAPSHOT).

--kevan




Reply via email to