Kevan, Actually I think the current 1.x version in trunk is 1.1.0, which is fully compatible with 1.1.1... as a result of this, it can just be upgraded in the 'dojo' plugin and be kept at the path of just /dojo
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warner wrote: > > Would this let us remove Dojo 0.4.3 from the server or would we keep it > there for users who might still be using it? If so, how long are we going > to do that for? My vote would be to yank it out after we're no longer > dependent on it, but I'm not sure what the community at large would think of > that. Regardless, I like your idea, Joe. > > > IMO, we would drop 0.4.3. I don't think we maintained for backward > compatibility reasons, more because we didn't want to update the admin > console code, at that point in time. > > I think it would be good to upgrade to 1.1.1. I also assume it would > replace the current 1.0.2 version? Perhaps we should consider encoding the > dojo version in the dojo path name. > > I'd prefer to see this work broken down into reasonable chunks (where > possible), so that we can track progress (and others can participate). First > add /dojo-1.1.1 and start incrementally moving code over to use new dojo. I > don't know the internals of the admin console. So, not sure how well that > work breaks down into manageable chunks. > > --kevan > > > > +1 > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Joseph Leong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I've been tossing the idea around in my head of taking the initiative to >> upgrade the current items written in Dojo to 1.1.1, I know we still have >> some Dojo 0.4.3, which isn't supported anymore, in use and there has been >> vast improvements with their new Dijit package for widgets among many other >> items. Also, with some recently reported JIRAs about accessibility >> compatibility being an issue in these Dojo components we can make use of the >> a11y available in it. Overall, i also think we might also benefit a cleaner >> setup from streamlining our versions in terms of future development and >> maintenance as well. >> >> Although I haven't looked in complete detail in each of the AG Dojo >> pieces, i know that the 0.4.3 transition to 1.1.1 will take some work >> because the widget system has been separated out to it's own pieces (diji) >> and so simple work arounds will not do. That is, this will be a big block >> change rather than an incremental one. >> >> Does anyone have any thoughts - one way or the other on this undertaking? >> >> >> Thanks! >> Joseph Leong >> > > > > -- > ~Jason Warner > > > -- Erik B. Craig
