I have to say that it is not very obvious - at least I didn't notice it when I installed it from console the first time. Also, I think as long as you have the right value osi-approved="true" in the geronimo-plugins.xml at the official site, it should be ok. Looks to me that the page is reading the site's geronimo-plugins.xml file for the plugin's detail information instead of the sample's geronimo-plugin.xml file.
Lin On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe Bohn wrote: >> >> Start of thread to discuss any concerns/issues/questions with the vote for >> the Server Repository plugin for Geronimo 2.1+ >> >> Joe >> > > Jarek posted an concern in his vote on this plugin: > Jarek Gawor wrote: >> +1 >> >> One minor comment: when installing the plugin using the admin console >> it shows the license as: >> >> License: The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 (Proprietary) >> >> and should be : >> >> License: The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 (Open Source) > > As you can see, he still voted +1. However, this concerns me. I guess > there must be something that I need to set for the plugin in the pom.xml to > indicate that this is apache licensed. The generated geronimo-plugin.xml > includes <license osi-approved="false">The Apache Software License, Version > 2.0</license> rather than indicating true for osi-approved. > > So ... what to do with the vote? I really don't like the erroneous license > message. I'm leaning toward cancelling the vote again to get this fixed. > What are your opinions? > > Joe >
