Hi Dan,
First, thanks again for your help with this!
I think you can go ahead and start the CXF 2.0.8 release process. I've
still got some more tests to go ... but so far things are looking good
and most of the tests have completed. If we do happen to find a problem
we'll discover it soon.
Joe
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just FYI: once we get validation that the snapshots fix the tck
problems, I'm ready to roll the CXF 2.0.8 release. I just need the
go-ahead signal.
Dan
On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. CXF
has a fix that is currently included in 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT. If we give
them the green light they will push a release soon.
At this point I'm trying to decide the best course of action. If you
have an opinion please speak up:
1) Delay a 2.1.2 release until we verify CXF 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT with the
tck and get a CXF 2.0.8 release
2) Revert back to cxf 2.0.2-incubator that we shipped with in
Geronimo 2.1.1
3) Revert to CXF 2.0.5 which should work and not have the problem
that just discovered. We would have to verify this.
I'm currently building new images to verify cxf 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT for #1.
At the moment I'm thinking this is our best option. If there are
problems I'll attempt #3. #2 would be the quickest path to a release
but IMO is the least desirable.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
I know it's a little bit more than the usual 24 hours but since a
weekend is involved I figured I'd give a bit more advanced notice so
that nobody is caught unaware.
As we've previously discussed, I plan to create a branch for 2.1.2
release processing on Monday, 7/21 around 10:00 ET.
Joe
FYI ... I'm stalling a little on the branch. A potential issue has
arisen with TCK and I'm waiting until we understand it a little
better prior to branching.
Joe
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
