Re: Documentation of new 2.2 features in current wiki?

[Donald Woods]

Joe, thanks for doing this. The maintenance of multiple spaces is worth enabling the community to start working on the 2.2 docs.

-Donald


Joe Bohn wrote:

Here's a link to the new space:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/documentation.html



Everyone,


Rebekah,


Thanks,
Joe


wei zhang wrote:

To get things moving I went ahead and did an export of the current Geronimo 2.1 space (GMOxDOC21) and restored it as Geronimo 2.2 (GMOxDOC22). I only changed the space name and the initial title so there are tons of references to Geronimo 2.1 in this new space still. As you can see it looks a lot like the 2.1 space still since it has not yet been updated with any 2.2 specifics (beyond a few title changes). Now that we have 2 spaces we will need to mirror appropriate updates in the 2.1 space into the 2.2 space. Please help us keep the doc consistent where appropriate. Also, feel free to update the new space with specifics for Geronimo 2.2 now that we have it. I think this should get you moving on making the proposed updates. Please update/remove/etc... the references to Geronimo 2.1 as necessary to reflect that this is for Geronimo 2.2.

Well, only the Export/Restore actions require administrator authority. Others like move and copy pages can be done by author, and I have tried those actions.

On 8/19/08, *Joe Bohn* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hmmm ... it seems that we might have a problem then.  If admin
    authority is required to export/restore then it is also most likely
    the case that admin is required to move pages and such for the
    proposed new structure.  It might not be possible for Rebekah to
    make these changes.

    I'm also wondering if we are really at the point where it makes
    sense to copy the 2.1 doc to 2.2 and start incurring the duplicate
    maintenance costs.  There are not yet any 2.2 pages created under
    the parent page that we made for that purpose.  Is now really the
    time to export/restore?

    Joe

    PS.  I also attempted to do a quick export/restore with a very
    simple space prior to leaving for vacation.  I had some problems too
    ... I can't recall what they were at the moment ... I'll have to
    give it another shot ... but there might be more than just an
    authority issue with this process.


    wei zhang wrote:

        Hi I tried the Export/Restore option David Belvins suggested,
        but couldn't make any progress because only the administrator
        can perfrom such actions. Can someone with administrator
        authority help?
         Thanks.
        Rebekah Zhang

         On 8/19/08, *David Jencks* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:


           On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:28 PM, Jack Cai wrote:

               Is someone working on copying 2.1 space to 2.2? :-) If we
        don't
               have a solution for the copy approach, maybe we just let
        Rebekah




           options on aug 1 in this thread.  Is there some problem with
        doing
           export/restore?

           thanks
           david jencks



               -Jack

and her colleagues go ahead to manually copy & reorganize... David Blevins posted fairly complete instructions for the various

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature