Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.

--jason


On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <jason.dil...@gmail.com> wrote:
The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase
with.

As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I
had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.

--jason


On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
my HD.  Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?

--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com





--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to