This sounds promising. It's especially nice that they are using Apache 2.0 Licensing. I see that they keep up the nightly builds. I wonder how active this group really is. If there's a forum, maybe you can ping them to find out how real they are.
Thanks for finding this. Kevin On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Jeremy Bauer <techhu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin, > > I did some searching and ran across agimatic-validation[1] by agimatic > GmbH, > a JSR-303 implementation in the works. It is published under the Apache > 2.0 > License. The Hibernate JSR-303 spec jar is currently listed as dependency, > but using it with a Geronimo equivalent may be an option. > > -Jeremy > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/agimatec-validation/ > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > The JPA 2.0 expert group is looking to incorporate Bean Validation > > (JSR-303). Right now, it looks like we might include it as an optional > > feature. If a Bean Validation provider is available, then the JPA > provider > > should use it. Otherwise, it is not a requirement. > > > > The RI is being developed by Redhat. There was an Apache Commons sandbox > > started for a potential Bean Validator provider, but the activity has > died > > off. > > > > So, I'm wondering from an OpenJPA and OpenEJB perspective, what should we > > do? I may be mistaken, but my guess is that the EJB spec is going to > > contain a similar dependency on Bean Validation. I don't believe the RI > > will be directly accessible to us via a Maven dependency. Does anybody > > know > > of other Bean Validation provider implementations that are in plan? > > > > Thoughts, suggestions? > > > > Kevin > > >
