I think that is the case now, I was confused (still a little too) as
to why the <web-app id="" was being used instead.
--jason
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
IMO, war file's name is more user friendly.
-Rex
2009/6/16 Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com>
WebApp_ID is not so friendly, not sure when it begins, this should
be improved, maybe we could use the war file's name as the default
context.
2009/6/16 Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Aren't we trying to do something a little bit more intelligent about
picking a context for deployed wars w/o a plan.xml?
Seems like all of these "default/..." wars want to mount under /
WebApp_ID... forcing me to make a plan for them, just to set the
context.
Is this how it always worked?
--jason
--
Ivan
