It is in http://repository.apache.org/snapshots. But this site is in the root pom file, it should not have problem in downloading this module. Ivan
2009/6/18 Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> > My trunk build keeps puking on: > > <snip> > Missing: > ---------- > 1) org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:jasper:jar:6.0.18-SNAPSHOT > > Try downloading the file manually from the project website. > > Then, install it using the command: > mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat > -DartifactId=jasper -Dversion=6.0.18-SNAPSHOT -Dpackaging=jar > -Dfile=/path/to/file > > Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file > there: > mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat > -DartifactId=jasper -Dversion=6.0.18-SNAPSHOT -Dpackaging=jar > -Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] > > Path to dependency: > 1) org.codehaus.mojo.jspc:jspc-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0-alpha-2 > 2) org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:jasper:jar:6.0.18-SNAPSHOT > > </snip> > > Where is this dep? > > --jason > > > On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:31 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > >> On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:36 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: >> >> Why do the assemblies in the repository have dependencies? I realize >>> that they are probably there to facilitate the build, but shouldn't they all >>> be marked as <scope>provided</scope>? >>> >>> The reason I think they should be, is that when a user wants to use the >>> geronimo-maven-plugin with the assembly -bin in the repository, before they >>> can even download the assembly -bin, first mvn has to go resolve every >>> single dependency which is used to build that assembly -bin. >>> >>> I think this is broken, while I can resolve by adding a tone of excludes, >>> I think that this problem should be solved so that users can more easily >>> consume the assembly artifacts we publish to the repository. >>> >>> Any one know how easy/feasible with the current stuff (trunk and 2.1.x) >>> it would be to mark all dependencies as provided? >>> >> >> Just thinking about it I don't see why it would cause problems. Would you >> like to try it and see if the server at least builds? If there are no >> obvious problems I'd be fine with this change. >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> >>> --jason >>> >> > -- Ivan
