I've slightly enhanced what you did. Mostly, I've added the following lines:
<Import-Package>!org.apache.geronimo.connector*,*</Import-Package> <_versionpolicy>[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))</_versionpolicy> The first line is to ensure that the bundle won't import the package it exports. Such a thing is ok for an api, but not for an implementation / library as you certainly don't want to use classes from another version of the bundle. The second line makes sure the version uses ranges by default such as [2.1,3.0), meaning any version >= 2.1 and < 3.0. This assume backward compatibility between minor releases. FWIW, if you don't put anything, it would be [2.1,), meaning anything >= 2.1. For the javax.resource package, it can't really be optional, as the GeronimoTransactionManager implements javax.resource.spi.XATerminator. If we want to not import this package, we could add this only class to the bundle and not export the package. That would mean the maven dependency could be removed altogether ... On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 19:04, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I thought I had already bundleized 2.1.... since we are using the 2.0.0 > bundle plugin a direct merge or [1] won't work. In the interests of my > learning how to set this stuff up I just committed a bundleization of 2.1. > Can you please check it? In particular, should the import of > javax.resource in txmanager be optional? > thanks > david jencks > > On Sep 3, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I'd like this commit [1] to be releases somehow. > I'll backport it to the 2.1 branch asap. > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=615758 > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:00, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> A long time ago, I've made those two jars available as OSGi bundles, but >> they haven't been released yet because I did that in trunk. >> I'd really like to have those as bundles, so I can backport the pom >> changes in the branch and release from the branch or release trunk. >> Not sure what the exact status for this component is. I've seen djencks >> made some changes in the branch that are not available in trunk, but trunk >> also has some changes. >> >> >> Can you be more specific about the changes and which svn urls you are >> talking about? >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk uses >> connector 1.6 spec, so I don't think we will release it until we have some >> idea that we are fairly OK with the ee6 tck, and also that it works with >> whatever osgi stuff we end up with in g. trunk. >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/branches/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.1uses >> connector 1.5 and we need to release it for g. 2.2 as it has some >> important bug fixes. >> >> Making sure both of these are osgi-workable would be great. I thought I'd >> merged all the bug fixes both ways between these branches, if you see a >> problem please let me know! >> >> I'm hoping to get to releasing some specs and other sub-projects for 2.2 >> this week, so if you can make sure the 2.1 branch is acceptable that would >> be really great! >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> >> Please advise what would be the best way to proceed here. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
