If the update/review of the LICENSE/NOTICE information is a lot of work, send some my way if it will help release some of the developer's time for more important tasks.
Quintin Beukes On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >> I think things are moving along for 2.2. >> >> - our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed its >> vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look. >> >> - ActiveMQ is pushing release candidates. The first one showed no tck >> problems in geronimo. >> >> - OpenEJB IIUC is pretty much ready to release. > > It looks like OpenEJB has an SFSB problem, which will need to be fixed > before they release a 3.1.2. > >> >> --------------- >> >> Stuff to do: >> >> - tranql has been getting some attention lately. We should try to find a >> jdbc expert verify the list of non-fatal SQLCodes. I would like to >> rearrange tranql svn, but otherwise I'm OK with the code for now. After we >> verify stuff works I can release this. > > This would be really good, IMO. Will see if I can find somebody to help > review the SQLCodes. > >> >> - We have a pluto fix that I'm hoping we can duplicate in geronimo >> somehow. IIRC we have a couple of pluto driver classes replaced in geronimo >> already, I hope we can do the same with this pluto fix. Pushing a pluto 1.x >> release could be difficult. >> >> - We don't know yet whether the maven release plugin and apache-release >> profile will work with geronimo. >> >> - review the jiras carefully. > > - update / review LICENSE & NOTICE information. > > --kevan >
