I've gone ahead and done this with the following changes from the
proposal:
1. I didn't change the query language at all, leaving it under tranql.
2. I left all the tags in place, since they are referred to by the
released poms.
All further connector development should take place in ra/trunk.
I've also pushed snapshots of all the connectors with the updated poms.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:41 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've been irked for a while with the tranql svn organization and
just bit myself by not being careful enough to check the extent of
the changes IDEA made. I'd like to reorganize svn to make life
clearer and simpler.
1. There are basically 2 projects, the query language itself which
is not really under active development at the moment, and the j2ca
connector framework which occasionally gets tweaked. I'd like to
separate them.
2. We have a lot of foo/bar/trunk type directories. Our experience
in the geronimo specs projects is that maven 2 has no problem with
separately versioned subprojects all under trunk.
So, I'd like to propose
ql/
+/branches
+/tags
+/trunk
ra/
+/branches
+/tags
+/trunk
Under ra/trunk we'd have connector, connector-ra, and the individual
vendor directories such as derby, oracle, etc.
Thoughts? In particular does anyone think moving the existing tags
will cause problems?
thanks
david jencks
