Come on just use javaee, and be done with it. --jason
On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE. We had several instances of the > "JEE" usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminded of > the correct naming by one of our PMC members who works for Sun :-) > > For distribution names (like zip and plugin filenames) I agree that we > need to come up with a consistent naming scheme that is compatible with > the Sun guidelines. > > BUT, in the source code, I would argue we can use "jee" all we want, as > they are internal variables/attribute names. > > > -Donald > > > On 1/29/10 3:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote: >> I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe "javaee" or "ee". >> >> -Jack >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com >> <mailto:genspr...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Good idea if following concerns are addressed: >> >> 1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan. >> 2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang <rwo...@gmail.com >> <mailto:rwo...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee" in our new >> Geronimo. >> There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin >> project names, artifact names, "j2eeType"... >> So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee? >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> >> -- >> Lei Wang (Rex) >> rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Shawn >> >>
