Upgraded to 1.4.2 in 22 and trunk with this JIRA:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5193


On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Rex Wang <rwo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> 2010/3/19 Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
>
> DOJO 1.4.2 is in maven central now.  If no objections, I'll update dojo to
>> 1.4.2 in 22 and trunk.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems dojo team does't know how to publish the new dojo artifacts to
>>> maven central. see
>>>
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dojo.devel/12091
>>>
>>> Does anyone know this ? maybe we can tell them how to do.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Jay D. McHugh <jaydmch...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I asked on the Dojo mailing list to see if someone was going to deploy a
>>>> current version (1.4.0) out to a public repo - but since 12/15/09 there
>>>> has not been any response.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe if someone else asked too...
>>>>
>>>> Jay
>>>>
>>>> Rex Wang wrote:
>>>> > So far I can not find dojo 1.4.x in any public repo? However, i am
>>>> agree
>>>> > for this update in 3.0 once it done.
>>>> >
>>>> > In G2.2, the portlets using dojo1.3.2 are ejb portlet and debug view
>>>> > portlets, some portlets may need rewrite or remove in G3.0, such as
>>>> > classloaders, ldap... So it is OK to make these changes and lib update
>>>> > all in one step.
>>>> >
>>>> > -Rex
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2010/1/6 Delos <dait...@gmail.com <mailto:dait...@gmail.com>>
>>>> >
>>>> >     As I know, some new widgets are added and most of the widgets from
>>>> >     old version are kept.
>>>> >
>>>> >     I agree with Shawn, we can verify the pages once admin console in
>>>> G
>>>> >     3.0 is ready.
>>>> >
>>>> >     Thanks!
>>>> >
>>>> >     2010/1/6 Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>> genspr...@gmail.com>>
>>>> >
>>>> >         Agree , we should test the functions that were using old dojo
>>>> to
>>>> >         see if they are still working after upgrading to dojo 1.4.0.
>>>> >
>>>> >         On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com
>>>> >         <mailto:xhh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >             Is the new version compatable with the old one ? If yes, I
>>>> >             think we could upgrade it.
>>>> >
>>>> >             2010/1/6 Delos <dait...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>> dait...@gmail.com>>
>>>> >
>>>> >                 Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> >                 Dojo 1.4.0 has released on Dec.15.  How about upgrade
>>>> >                 Dojo version to 1.4.0 for Geronimo 3.0?
>>>> >
>>>> >                 Some new Widgets are provided, such as
>>>> EnhancedDataGrid;
>>>> >                 meanswhile a lot of refactoring work makes it faster
>>>> >                 than before.
>>>> >
>>>> >                 BTW, for you to feel the improvement of Dojo 1.4.0, I
>>>> >                 have uploaded a demo of pluto 2.0 and Dojo 1.4.0 here
>>>> >
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/delos/portlet+dojo/portlet-dojo1.4.0-demo.zip
>>>> .
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >                 Steps to run demo
>>>> >                 1. Extract the zip
>>>> >                 2. launch "bin/startup.sh" or bin/startup.bat"
>>>> >                 3. visit
>>>> >                 "http://localhost:8080/pluto/portal/BundlePage“, you
>>>> >                 will see a portlet showing OSGI bundles with dojo
>>>> 1.4.0
>>>> >                 widgets
>>>> >
>>>> >                 Upgrade to Dojo 1.4.0, any comments?
>>>> >
>>>> >                 Thanks!
>>>> >                 --
>>>> >                 Best Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> >                 Delos
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >             --
>>>> >             Ivan
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >         --
>>>> >         Shawn
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     --
>>>> >     Best Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> >     Delos
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Lei Wang (Rex)
>>>> > rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>



-- 
Shawn

Reply via email to