+1 build OK 2010/6/11 Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
> +1 > > Built both artifacts from source. > Jars contained correct looking License/Notice files. > RAT returned some hits, but they were not new files and were mostly for > provider and test files. Can we get some excludes added for future > releases? > > > -Donald > > > On 6/11/10 6:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > > This is a bug fix release to fix a major problem with using the javamail > > code on EBCDIC-based platforms. The JIRA in question is > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326 > > > > The second attempt version also corrects the Java 5 compilation errors > > encountered with the first attempt. > > > > This is a single vote for new versions of the javamail spec, providers, > > and mail uber-jar. > > > > The 3 components up for vote are: > > > > geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1 > > geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.1 > > geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.1 > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > Staging repo: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-048/ > > > > The source repos are: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1 > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.1 > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > -- Ivan
