I was able to build and run a few sample applications. It looks fine. My +1.
--Ashish On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1vams...@gmail.com>wrote: > +1 > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. This >> version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an upgrade >> to the spring framework dependency. >> >> The tag has been created here: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6 >> >> The staging repo is here: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008 >> >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives: >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip >> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository >> for your convenience: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/> >> >> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for >> longer than the 72-hour minimum. >> >> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door >> [ ] 0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) >> >> Rick >> > > > > -- > Vamsi >
