I have re-uploaded all the correct 2.2.1 artifacts to dist. Will they be automatically sync to all mirrors?
-Rex 2011/1/5 Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> > Sorry, I uploaded the versions to dist in my machine. It contains > the bad openejb 3.1.4 release which was downloaded when I used the > staging one to run tck. > > Because Maven won't download the release artifacts again if there's > local one. To avoid this kind of problems in the future, we should > add a step in the release process to delete local repo before starting > the release. > > This time, Luckily, Rex could help upload the right geronimo > artifacts in his local machine to dist again to fix this. > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Rex Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Verified. > > > > the one > > > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz > > is correct. > > > > So we need replace the wrong one in dist. > > > > -Rex > > > > 2011/1/5 Rex Wang <[email protected]> > >> > >> I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release > artifacts. > >> I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12 Nov, > >> so I think the > >> > http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz > >> might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted from > >> staging repo > >> > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz > >> > >> I am downloading it to verify... > >> > >> -Rex > >> > >> 2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >>> > >>> > Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4 > >>> > binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that > never > >>> > passed. > >>> > > >>> > $ cd /tmp > >>> > $ wget -q > >>> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz > >>> > $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz > >>> > $ jar tvf > >>> > > /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar > >>> > | tail > >>> > 562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class > >>> > 7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd > >>> > 6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd > >>> > 2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd > >>> > 32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties > >>> > 0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/ > >>> > 0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/ > >>> > 0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 > >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/ > >>> > 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010 > >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml > >>> > 115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 > >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties > >>> > > >>> > $ wget -q -U Maven > >>> > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar > >>> > $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail > >>> > 562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class > >>> > 7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd > >>> > 6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd > >>> > 2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd > >>> > 32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties > >>> > 0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/ > >>> > 0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/ > >>> > 0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 > >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/ > >>> > 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010 > >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml > >>> > 115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010 > >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug: > >>> > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394 > >>> > > >>> > We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind. Whether or > >>> > not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion > to > >>> > have. > >>> > >>> Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our > release > >>> process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or > some > >>> other precaution to prevent this from happening. > >>> > >>> --kevan > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Lei Wang (Rex) > >> rwonly AT apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > > Lei Wang (Rex) > > rwonly AT apache.org > > > > > > -- > Shawn > -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org
