On Apr 25, 2011, at 1:24 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Also.... There's a certain amount of flailing around in my (local) git > commits. I don't want to spend a lot of time trying to massage these into > clean atomic well-thought-out steps but I could try to do a little bit of > rebasing to combine the most obviously related commits into more sensible > units. > > What would people like in svn? > > -- to see all the incremental steps
I have no need to see every incremental step. > > -- to see a slightly better organized version with a few sets of commits > merged together Fine by me. > -- to see one commit with all changes merged (I don't think this is a good > idea, but it certainly is easy) Personally, that's fine, also. Intermediate steps, at this point, don't really provide much information. In the future, I think we need to find a better way of handling revolutions like this... I think the work needs to be appearing in svn more frequently -- and hopefully attracting more collaboration. --kevan
