I've fixed the obvious problem in the last source and am pushing a new one. There might be memory consumption issues.... ran out of permgen trying to start the server by itself, but I might not have my environment set up the same as before so it might not be worse.
thanks david jencks On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:50 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Forrest and everyone, > > This last source drop should be good to run the tck against. > > Aries as of rev 1132725 should be fine. Tim expects to be reverting one of > the fixes and reimplementing it in a better way, so if you build aries be > sure the svn revision is 1132725 or after tim's new fix. > > There were also changes in openejb, and owb to pick up. > > thanks! > david jencks > > On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >> Locally I've got to the same jcdi failures as trunk (after changes in aries, >> OWB, and openejb). I just pushed a new source zip. DId this last tck run >> complete? Do we need to do another one before committing the osgi changes? >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >> >>> I ever encounter build problem on aries trunk, and now they are fixed, the >>> aries trunk artifacts now in my local repo. Just trigger a new server >>> build, and let's wait to see :) >>> >>> Forrest >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:07 PM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>> The last two source uploads should only be using aries trunk. The aries >>> branches/0.3-RCx builds jars with the same version as trunk but they >>> definitely won't work. >>> >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Jun 2, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >>> >>>> Are you refresh the code from https://people.apache.org/~djencks/? >>>> >>>> Here is the list that I built for dependencies: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/util/ >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/blueprint/ >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/application/ >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/ >>>> >>>> I there are mixed version for aries dependencies, some are in branches, >>>> some are in trunk. Maybe geronimo side has something left need to update, >>>> I don't know. >>>> >>>> Forrest >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > Hi Forrest, >>>> > >>>> > I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) >>>> > I just committed an update to OWB that makes it more compatible with >>>> > aries proxying/weaving so you may want to build owb also. >>>> > OWB is in the build chain already :) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I'll probably be around on and off tonight so if you run into problems >>>> > soon I might be able to fix them tonight. >>>> > Triggering an execution just now, so far no problem. thanks! >>>> > Hi David J, >>>> > >>>> > After compiling the snapshot dependencies of aries, I still get >>>> > compilation error at plugins/aries/geronimo-aries and >>>> > geronimo-aries-builder. >>>> > >>>> > [INFO] Compilation failure >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > /home/tcker/tckdata/tckbuildsrc/djg30/plugins/aries/geronimo-aries/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/aries/GeronimoApplication.java:[52,46] >>>> > [deprecation] createDeploymentMetadata(java.io.InputStream) in >>>> > org.apache.aries.application.DeploymentMetadataFactory has been >>>> > deprecated >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > /home/tcker/tckdata/tckbuildsrc/djg30/plugins/aries/geronimo-aries/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/aries/GeronimoApplication.java:[63,31] >>>> > cannot find symbol >>>> > symbol : constructor >>>> > SimpleBundleInfo(org.apache.aries.util.manifest.BundleManifest,java.lang.String) >>>> > location: class >>>> > org.apache.aries.application.utils.management.SimpleBundleInfo >>>> > >>>> > I tried to fix them, but confused around variant aries util/utils >>>> > classes. >>>> >>>> Everything builds fine for me. Are you certain you're building the current >>>> version of Aries trunk? Sure looks like SimpleBundleInfo contains the >>>> constructor that the compiler is complaining about... >>>> >>>> --kevan >>>> >>> >>> >> >
