I'll give trunk a try with connector 3.1.1 today and report back. I did a fair bit of work on the connector support in openejb, and just went for the latest snapshot of geronimo connector at the time. I think 3.1.1 will probably be fine.
If everyone is happy then I'll kick of the release process for a beta once xbean is published. Please shout if there's any problem with that. Jon On Aug 27, 2011 2:13 AM, "Shawn Jiang" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for volunteering ! Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is > connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT a must-have ? > > can we use connector 3.1.1 for the openejb beta for now ? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:11 AM > Subject: Re: Trunk beta release > To: [email protected], [email protected] > > > Thank you for volunteering ! Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is > connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT > > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I think it would be great to get some kind of alpha/beta/milestone release >> out. >> >> We deliberately keep the examples on a different version number to openejb, >> as there shouldn't be any dependency there, but we create an examples zip >> at >> release time as well as everything else I believe. >> >> I'm not too sure about javaee-api - obviously it follows the javaee >> version. >> My guess is we could choose to push that at the same time as the everything >> else as well. >> >> I think we'd need xbean and geronimo connector publishing first. >> >> I'm happy to volunteer to do the release work, if that's any help. >> >> Jon >> On Aug 26, 2011 7:15 AM, "Shawn Jiang" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Anyway, let's start to do this and figure how rough the trunk is step by >> > step. the first step would be to clean the snapshot depencencies up: >> > >> > <xbeanVersion>3.8-SNAPSHOT</xbeanVersion> >> > >> >> <org.apache.openwebbeans.version>1.1.1-SNAPSHOT</org.apache.openwebbeans.version> >> > <geronimo.connector.version>3.1.1-SNAPSHOT</geronimo.connector.version> >> > >> > >> > There are also some internal compoents that are using different version >> then >> > 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT. >> > >> > <javaee-api.version>6.0-SNAPSHOT</javaee-api.version> >> > >> > some samples in trunk are using 1.1-SNAPSHOT, But I can find part of them >> > are still 1.0-SNAPSHOT. >> > >> > I'm not sure what's the pratice to release javaee-api and samples when >> they >> > don't share the same version with trunk. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Blevins <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> I suspect that even if we get started now, it will still be a few weeks >> >> before we see anything. It's been over a year on trunk with no release. >> >> It's going to be rough. >> >> >> >> Best case scenario, we get two releases out before October. Worst case >> >> scenario, we wait too long to start and don't get any. >> >> >> >> -David >> >> >> >> On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: >> >> >> >> > Don't know if geronimo can wait until javaone. We could release a >> >> openejb >> >> > m1/beta1, and then release a m2/beta2 for javaone. >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> maybe we should wait just before javaone? >> >> >> >> >> >> - Romain >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/8/26 Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Geronimo is going to make a beta release. Let's discuss a openejb >> >> >> trunk >> >> >>> release again. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM, David Blevins < >> >> [email protected] >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Would be excellent if we could get a beta ready before this >> >> >> presentation >> >> >>> on >> >> >>>> the 25th: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> http://www.oscon.com/oscon2011/public/schedule/detail/20105 >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Might be kind of tight, but ideally there would be at least >> something >> >> >>> there >> >> >>>> for people to download and play with. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -David >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> Shawn >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Shawn >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Shawn >> > > > > -- > Shawn > > > > -- > Shawn
