-1 for the Samples release. Unless I've made a mistake, samples/osgi/wab-sample/pom.xml is still missing a source license header.
Everything else looked ok for Samples. I checked signature/checksum, rat, and build. I did not perform any testing of the samples applications… Daytrader looks good. Here's my +1. I checked signature/checksum, rat, license/notice, and build. I did not perform any Daytrader testing. IMO, you can create a new vote for samples/daytrader. Or, you can complete the daytrader vote and start a new samples vote… Your call… --kevan On Nov 18, 2011, at 6:28 AM, viola lu wrote: > Hi Devs, > > A release candidate for Geronimo Sample & Daytrader 3.0-beta-1 has been > created and staged. > > The tags have been created here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/tags/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1 > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/daytrader/tags/daytrader-3.0-beta-1/ > > The staging repos is here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-210/ > > > The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-210/org/apache/geronimo/samples/samples-parent/3.0-beta-1/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1-source-release.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-210/org/apache/geronimo/samples/samples-parent/3.0-beta-1/samples-parent-3.0-beta-1-source-release.zip > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-210/org/apache/geronimo/daytrader/daytrader-parent/3.0-beta-1/daytrader-parent-3.0-beta-1-source-release.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-210/org/apache/geronimo/daytrader/daytrader-parent/3.0-beta-1/daytrader-parent-3.0-beta-1-source-release.zip > > > > The vote will be open for the 72-hour minimum. > > [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door > [ ] 0 no opinion > [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) > > -- > viola > > Apache Geronimo >
