Thanks for your comments and the discussion so far. Here is another commit proposal for the spec jar which will fix two jiras and i want to ask again for comments/feedback:
https://github.com/salyh/jm14specsvn/commit/36befc6011aea101afc86d53a2398d14b9a50d66 This commit fixes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5842 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6480 The Testcase for 6480 will be part of the impl project because james is needed for that: https://github.com/salyh/geronimo-javamail/commit/8290488e7911bab87bb07c8a3e9adefd9a368b0a Thanks Hendrik On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Hendrik Dev <hendrikde...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> But despite of that the feature discussion is the important one. Have >> not looked yet on greenmail 1.4 but i would like to use a "real" >> mailserver to test the javamail impl. and james seems to be the >> perfect candidate: >> its an apache project, its (mostly) rfc compliant, its suitable for >> unittesting and possibly synergy effects if the project use each >> other. > > > All sounds good. > >> >> >> The big problem of geronimo javamail (impl, not spec) is the (almost >> complete) absence of unittests. Writing these should not be limited by >> a fake implementation like greenmail especially for testing IMAP >> (which is itself a mess already :-) > > > Yes. Afraid most of the "testing" has been from the TCK. More unit tests > would be fantastic! > > --kevan -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
